Optimizing Restorative Justice as an Alternative to Overcoming Corporate Crime in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v27i1.10388Keywords:
Restorative Justice, Corporation, Criminal Liability, Victim Offender MediationAbstract
This research aims to analyze how the regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia and the opportunity of restorative justice as an alternative to corporate crime prevention in Indonesia. By using a normative approach this research uses a case approach, statutory approach, philosophical approach and comparative approach, this research explores the regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia and how the challenges of alternative corporate crime resolution through restorative justice as a means of crime prevention. The results of this study The legal framework in Indonesia has not been able to fully address the complexity of corporate criminal liability, both in terms of material and procedural aspects.The retributive approach has proven to not touch the root of the problem. This is where restorative justice offers an alternative with a focus on restoring relations between perpetrators, victims, and the community. However, its application in the corporate context is still limited and not supported by integrated regulations.Meanwhile, countries such as France and Germany have adopted the Victim Offender Mediation (VOM) mechanism as part of their criminal justice system. In France, VOM has a strong legal basis, including the 1993 amendment to the Criminal Procedure Code and institutional support from INAVEM. VOM is implemented at the pre prosecution stage, with the condition that the perpetrator admits guilt and the victim's consent. Judges and prosecutors are given the discretion to drop the case if mediation is successful.VOM there is not only a forum for compromise, but also a tool for restoring participatory and humane justice. With a clear mechanism and the active role of mediation institutions, this system opens up opportunities for renewal in handling corporate crimes in Indonesia.
References
Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208
Alhakim, A., & Soponyono, E. (2019). Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.322-336
Ariyani, W., & Mellyana, N. E. (2022). Keadilan restoratif sebagai upaya penyelesaian tindak pidana untuk terwujudnya penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.11000
Box, S. (1983). Crime and mystification. New York: Tavistock Publications.
Daud, K. R., & Frans, M. P. (2024). Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA): Model Keadilan Bagi Korporasi dan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Pajak. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(7). https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/583
Emaliawati, E., Saragih, B., & Mulyana, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Social Work Sanction as a Substitute for Imprisonment in The Perspective of Sentencing Purposes. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(3), 325. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9359/a9e26bc0188d73f50a2f963a8551bd9057b8.pdf
Gillies, P. (1990). Criminal law (2nd ed.). Sydney: The Law Book Company Limited.
Gunawan, T. J. (2022). Kajian Limitasi Maksimum Sanksi Pidana Kejahatan Ekonomi-Perspektif Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 3(2), 53-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v3i2.84
Hutauruk, R. H. (2013). Penanggulangan kejahatan korporasi melalui pendekatan restoratif: Suatu terobosan hukum (Cet. Pe.; I. Tarmizi, Ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Intihani, S. N. (2022). Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine Implementation in Limited Company Stockholders Activities. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 4(1), 101-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v4i1.95
Joko, D. J. S., SH, M., & Santrawan, S. T. P. (2022). Implementasi Restorative Justice Pada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Tindak Pidana Pinjaman Online Sesuai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(5), 1461-1472. http://repo.jayabaya.ac.id/3529/1/27514-83773-1-PB.pdf
Judah, E. H. (2013). Criminal justice: Retribution vs. restoration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203046944
Juliardi, B., Runtunuwu, Y. B., Musthofa, M. H., Darmawansya, A., Asriyani, A., Hazmi, R. M., Syahril, M. A. F., et al. (2023). Metode penelitian hukum (Ed. Pertama). Padang: CV. Gita Lentera.
Kristian. (2016). Sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi (Tinjauan teoritis dan perbandingan hukum di berbagai negara) (Eds. C. Tanuwijaya & D. Sumayah). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Kristian. (2020). Penerapan sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi lembaga perbankan ditinjau dari teori-teori sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v17i2.4550
Kristiyadi, K., & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). Keadilan Restoratif dan Mediasi Penal dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(1), 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32502/khk.v4i1.4622
Kurniawan, I. (2023). Kriteria Untuk Menenentukan Bentuk-Bentuk Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dari Korporasi Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. UNES Law Review, 5(3), 1285-1306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.444
Kusumo, B. A. (2005). Tindak Pidana Korporasi dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. JAMASADA: Journal Of Human Resource Management, 5(2). https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Manajemen/article/view/612
Manurung, G. I. ., Martono Anggusti, & July Esther. (2025). Settlement of Corporate Crime with Restorative Justice Approach. Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13521
Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian hukum: Edisi revisi. https://books.google.com
Muladi. (2015). Identifikasi teoritik dan konseptual pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi serta kebijakan kriminal untuk mengatasinya. [Bahan Kuliah Kejahatan Korporasi, Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang].
Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (2011). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mustafiddin, A. S., Jaya, F. A., & Susiana, L. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Korporasi yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 95/Pid. Sus-TPK/2019/PN Sby). Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 6(1), 79-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v6i1.3259
Narapati, I. D., Mertha, I. K., & Artha, I. G. Pengaturan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering). Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 12, p. 2323-2335, nov. 2021. ISSN 2303-0569. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/78887
Van Ness, D. W., & Johnstone, G. (n.d.). Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative justice (4th ed.; E. S. Boyne, Ed.). England: Willan Publishing.
Priyatno, D. (2017). Sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam kebijakan legislasi (Cet. ke; S. Suwito & R. Ria, Eds.). Jakarta: Kencana.
Pujiyono, P. P., & Susanti, R. D. (2019). Alternatif Model Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, 2(2). https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/phpidana/article/view/25031
Rawiyakhirty, I. (2022). Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korporasi Terkait Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Pt Nindya Karya (Persero) ditinjau dari PERMA Nomor 13 Tahun 2016. Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan, 7(1), 21-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3140
Saleh, R. (1982). Pikiran-pikiran tentang pertanggungjawaban pidana (Ed. pertama). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sabadina, U. (2021). Politik Hukum Pidana Penanggulangan Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi Terkait Kebocoran Data Pribadi Oleh Korporasi Berbasis Online. Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 799-814. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Lex-Renaissance/article/view/20787
Satria, H. (2018). Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1), 111-123. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/5228
Septiyo, T., Setiyono, J., & Samara, M. R. (2020). Optimalisasi penerapan mediasi penal sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana. Jurnal Yuridis, 7(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i2.2122
Sibarani, S., & Santiago, F. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Berdasarkan Uu No 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Librum, 7(2), 125-138. https://www.neliti.com/publications/557875/pertanggungjawaban-pidana-terhadap-korporasi-berdasarkan-uu-no-20-tahun-2001-ten
Suhariyanto, B. (2018). The Role of Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 13 Year 2016 in Overcoming the Obstacles of Corporation Criminal Infringement. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 9(1). https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/855
Syahird, A. (2023). Restorative justice terhadap tindak pidana korporasi di bidang lingkungan hidup. Indonesian Journal of Education and Humanity.
Syaufi, A. (2020). Putusan tindak pidana pemilu dalam perspektif tujuan penegakan hukum. Plagiat Checker. https://eprints.ulm.ac.id
Torodji, R. (2024). Rekonstruksi sistem pemidanaan terhadap korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan yang berkeadilan. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 2(3). https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/82159-ID-penegakan-hukum-pemilu-tinjauan-atas-put.pdf
Yohanes, W., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Dampak tindak pidana ekonomi khusus terhadap investasi asing: Analisis kasus kejahatan korporasi di sektor industri. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 9(1). https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/1421
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin, Pujiyono, Irma Cahyaningtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
