Screening Plagiarism

The Journal of Judicial Review (JJR) employs a plagiarism screening process to maintain the integrity and originality of the articles published. The maximum allowable similarity index, as measured by the Turnitin plagiarism detection tool, is set at 20%. Here's how the plagiarism screening process works:

1. Submission - Authors submit their research articles to the Journal of Judicial Review for consideration. Along with the manuscript, they provide a signed statement affirming the originality of their work and acknowledging any sources used appropriately.

2. Plagiarism Check - Upon receiving a submission, the journal's editorial team performs a plagiarism check using the Turnitin software or a similar plagiarism detection tool. The manuscript is compared against a vast database of academic and online sources to identify any instances of textual similarity.

3. Similarity Report - The plagiarism detection tool generates a similarity report that highlights sections of the manuscript that match existing sources. The report provides a percentage indicating the level of similarity detected in the manuscript.

4. Editorial Evaluation - The editorial team carefully examines the similarity report and assesses the nature of the similarities identified. They consider factors such as the extent of matching content, the originality of the work, and whether the similarities are appropriately cited and attributed.

5. Decision Making - Based on the evaluation, the editorial team makes a decision regarding the manuscript. They may consider the following scenarios (1) Acceptance. If the similarity index is below the predetermined threshold (20% in this case) and the similarities detected are appropriately cited or attributed, the manuscript may proceed for further review; (2) Revision. If the similarity index exceeds the threshold or if the similarities are deemed unacceptable (e.g., unattributed verbatim copying or excessive paraphrasing without proper citation), the authors are notified and requested to revise their manuscript, addressing the identified issues; and (3) Rejection. In cases of substantial plagiarism or the presence of fraudulent practices, the manuscript may be rejected outright. The authors receive a clear explanation of the reasons for rejection.

6. Author Response and Revision - If revisions are requested, the authors are provided with the similarity report and specific instructions on how to address the identified similarities. They are given an opportunity to clarify or revise the manuscript accordingly.

7. Final Evaluation - After the authors submit their revised manuscript, the editorial team conducts a final evaluation, reviewing the changes made in response to the plagiarism check. If the revisions are satisfactory and the similarity index falls within the acceptable range, the manuscript proceeds for further review or publication.

By implementing this plagiarism screening process with a maximum similarity threshold of 20% using Turnitin or similar tools, the Journal of Judicial Review (JJR) ensures that published articles maintain a high standard of originality and academic integrity.