PUBLICATION ETHICS & MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

Journal of Judicial Review (JJR) sets high standards of ethical behavior by all parties involved in the journal publication, i.e., authors, journal editors, peer-reviewers, and the publisher to ensure objectivity and avoid the conflict of interests. As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal is committed to applying publication ethics as ethical guidelines in our three issues in a year. This statement adheres to COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. This journal has a primary responsibility to publish original work of value to the intellectual community in the best possible form and to the highest possible standards, with an expectation of similar standards from our reviewers and authors. Honesty, originality, and fair dealing on the part of authors, and fairness, objectivity, and confidentiality on the part of editors and reviewers are among the critical values that enable us to achieve our goal. This journal is committed to following best practices on ethical matters, errors, and retractions, and providing a legal review if necessary.

Journal of Judicial Review is committed to following best practices in addressing ethical matters. This includes promptly addressing and rectifying any errors that may arise and issuing retractions when necessary. Additionally, if required, we are dedicated to providing a legal review to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the content published in our journal. We strive to uphold the trust and integrity of our publication by fostering an environment of ethical conduct and responsible practices.

Editors at Journal of Judicial Review have several key responsibilities in ensuring a smooth and ethical publication process. These responsibilities include:

1. Publication Decisions: Editors are responsible for making informed decisions on which articles to accept, revise, or reject. They should consider the significance, originality, and quality of the research, as well as its relevance to the journal's scope and objectives. Editors base their decisions on fair and unbiased evaluations conducted by peer reviewers.

2. Peer Review Process: Editors oversee the peer review process, selecting appropriate reviewers who have expertise in the relevant subject area. They ensure that the peer review is conducted objectively and constructively, providing authors with feedback to improve the quality of their work. Editors also manage communication between authors and reviewers to facilitate a fair and efficient review process.

3. Editorial Policies: Editors establish and enforce the journal's editorial policies, guidelines, and ethical standards. They ensure that authors and reviewers are aware of these policies and adhere to them. Editors should also stay updated on emerging ethical issues and incorporate best practices to maintain the journal's integrity.

4. Quality Control: Editors are responsible for maintaining the overall quality of the journal's content. They oversee the editing and proofreading processes to ensure accuracy, clarity, and adherence to the journal's style and formatting guidelines. Editors may collaborate with authors to address any necessary revisions or improvements to enhance the overall quality of published articles.

5. Ethical Considerations: Editors must handle any ethical concerns or misconduct issues that may arise, such as plagiarism, duplicate submission, or data fabrication. They should follow the established guidelines and take appropriate actions, which may include retracting or correcting articles if necessary. Editors also ensure confidentiality and protect the rights of authors and reviewers throughout the publication process.

6. Editorial Board Management: Editors manage the journal's editorial board, which may include selecting board members, assigning roles and responsibilities, and fostering a collaborative and inclusive environment. They encourage diversity and representation within the board to ensure a balanced and comprehensive editorial decision-making process.

7. Journal Promotion: Editors actively promote the journal within the academic community, seeking to increase visibility and attract high-quality submissions. They may engage in networking, attend conferences, and collaborate with relevant organizations to enhance the journal's reputation and reach a wider audience.

Editors at Journal of Judicial Review bear the responsibility of upholding the journal's standards and ensuring the publication of high-quality, original, and ethically sound research.

Reviewers play a crucial role in the peer review process of the Journal of Judicial Review. Their responsibilities include:

1. Expert Evaluation: Reviewers are responsible for conducting a thorough and objective evaluation of the assigned manuscripts. They should assess the quality, originality, and validity of the research presented in the manuscript. Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement to help enhance the manuscript's overall quality.

2. Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to complete the review process within the specified timeframe provided by the journal. Promptness is crucial in ensuring the timely publication of articles and maintaining the efficiency of the journal's editorial process.

3. Confidentiality: Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the reviewed manuscripts. They should not discuss or disclose any information from the manuscript to any unauthorized individuals. Confidentiality helps protect the integrity and privacy of the authors' work.

4. Objectivity and Fairness: Reviewers should approach the review process with objectivity and fairness, without any personal bias or conflict of interest. They should evaluate the manuscript based solely on its scientific merit, relevance, and adherence to ethical standards.

5. Ethical Considerations: Reviewers should alert the journal editor if they identify any potential ethical concerns in the manuscript, such as plagiarism, fraudulent data, or unethical research practices. Reviewers play an essential role in upholding the ethical standards of the journal.

6. Constructive Feedback: Reviewers are encouraged to provide clear and constructive feedback to authors, pointing out strengths and weaknesses in the manuscript. They should provide specific recommendations for improvement, supporting their comments with relevant scholarly references, if applicable.

7. Professional Conduct: Reviewers should maintain a professional and courteous demeanor in their communication with authors and editors. Any conflicts or disagreements should be expressed in a respectful manner, focusing on the scientific content rather than personal criticism.

By fulfilling these responsibilities, reviewers contribute significantly to maintaining the quality and integrity of the publication process in the Sang Sewagati Journal. Their expertise and input are vital in ensuring the publication of high-quality and impactful research articles.

Authors are responsible for ensuring the integrity and quality of their submissions to the Journal of Judicial Review. The following are the responsibilities expected from authors:

1. Originality: Authors should ensure that their work is original and has not been previously published or submitted to any other publication. Any sources or materials used should be appropriately cited, giving proper credit to the original authors.

2. Accuracy: Authors should ensure that their research findings, data, and information presented in the manuscript are accurate and reliable. Any misleading or fraudulent statements are considered unethical and should be avoided.

3. Plagiarism: Authors should avoid any form of plagiarism, which includes copying or closely paraphrasing content from other sources without proper acknowledgment. All sources should be appropriately cited, and permission should be obtained for the use of copyrighted material.

4. Authorship and Acknowledgments: Only individuals who have made significant contributions to the research should be listed as authors. All authors should have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript before submission. Any contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be acknowledged in the acknowledgments section.

5. Conflict of Interest: Authors should disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence the research or its interpretation. This includes financial, personal, or professional relationships that could be perceived as biases.

6. Compliance with Ethical Standards: Authors should adhere to ethical standards and guidelines relevant to their research, including the protection of human subjects, animal welfare, and the proper handling of data. Research involving human subjects should have obtained appropriate informed consent.

7. Timely Response: Authors should respond promptly to any inquiries or requests from the journal's editors or reviewers during the peer-review process. They should also be willing to make necessary revisions or provide additional information when requested.

8. Corrections and Retractions: If authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, they should promptly inform the journal's editors and cooperate in issuing corrections or retractions, as required.

By fulfilling these responsibilities, authors contribute to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the Journal of Judicial Review and the broader academic community.

The publisher responsibilities of Journal of Judicial Review include the following:

1. Ensuring Ethical Conduct: The publisher has the duty to uphold ethical standards throughout the publication process. This involves promoting integrity, honesty, and fairness among all parties involved, including authors, editors, and reviewers. The publisher should ensure that all individuals adhere to ethical guidelines and policies in order to maintain the reputation and credibility of the journal.

2. Publication Oversight: The publisher is responsible for overseeing all stages of publication, from manuscript submission to final publication. They play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and consistency of published articles. This involves working closely with the editorial team to ensure timely and efficient processes, adherence to guidelines, and the overall integrity of the journal.

3. Safeguarding Copyright and Intellectual Property: The publisher must protect the rights of authors and ensure that copyright laws and intellectual property regulations are upheld. They should provide clear guidelines to authors regarding copyright transfer, permissions, and proper citation practices. Additionally, the publisher should take appropriate measures to prevent plagiarism and copyright infringement.

4. Dissemination and Accessibility: The publisher is responsible for making the published articles accessible to the target audience. This includes ensuring that the journal is available in both print and electronic formats and utilizing appropriate platforms and technologies for dissemination. The publisher should also promote open-access initiatives and explore strategies to enhance the visibility and reach of the journal's content.

5. Promoting Quality and Impact: The publisher should strive to maintain high-quality standards for the journal's publications. This involves working closely with the editorial team to establish rigorous peer-review processes, encouraging the submission of original and impactful research, and continuously monitoring the journal's performance and impact within the academic community.

6. Collaborating with Stakeholders: The publisher should foster strong relationships and collaborations with relevant stakeholders, including authors, researchers, academic institutions, and funding agencies. This involves actively engaging with the scholarly community, attending conferences, and seeking opportunities for partnerships that can enhance the journal's visibility and reputation.

7. Ensuring Transparency: The publisher should maintain transparency in all aspects of the publication process. This includes providing clear and comprehensive information on submission guidelines, peer-review processes, publication fees (if applicable), and any potential conflicts of interest. Transparency fosters trust and allows authors and readers to have a clear understanding of the journal's policies and practices.

Overall, the publisher of Journal of Judicial Review plays a vital role in upholding ethical standards, overseeing the publication process, safeguarding copyright and intellectual property, ensuring accessibility, promoting quality and impact, collaborating with stakeholders, and maintaining transparency.