The Regulatory Imperative for Trade Secret Valuation as Collateral to Enhance Financing Accessibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/barjoules.v3i1.11523Keywords:
Trade Secrets, Collateral Asset, Financing Access, Theory of Rechtsidee, SDGsAbstract
Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) play a pivotal role in Indonesia's national economic structure. Nevertheless, the dearth of comprehensive regulations and uniform valuation standards for trade secrets as collateral persists in impeding the effective implementation of intellectual property (IP)-based financing schemes. This legal gap is in direct opposition to the objectives of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 9, particularly target 9.3, which emphasizes enhancing access to financial services for MSMEs to promote inclusive industrialization and innovation. The present study aims to analyze the application of Gustav Radbruch's Theory of Rechtsidee in shaping a regulatory framework for the valuation of trade secrets as collateral in Indonesia. This study contributes both theoretically, by offering insights into legal development, and practically, by providing recommendations for policymakers to establish regulations that support a robust, inclusive, and innovation-driven financing ecosystem. Employing a normative juridical method, the research utilizes statutory and conceptual approaches to examine the legal, economic, and philosophical dimensions of trade secret valuation as a secured transaction instrument. The results of the study indicate that while trade secrets possess considerable potential as a financing instrument, the absence of a standardized, transparent, and legally recognized valuation mechanism constitutes a significant normative obstacle. According to the Theory of Rechtsidee, the principles of legal certainty, justice, and expediency must serve as the foundation for a regulatory framework that ensures legal effectiveness and equitable access to financing. The enhancement of trade secret valuation regulation in accordance with these principles not only fosters financial inclusion but also expedites the transition toward a sustainable and knowledge-based economy.
Downloads
References
Afdhali, D. R., & Syahuri, T. (2023). Idealıtas Penegakkan Hukum Dıtınjau Darı Perspektıf Teorı Tujuan Hukum. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i2.1078
Ali, Z. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta. In Sinar Grafika (Issue August).
Ayu, D., Sathyawati, S., Dewa, I., & Mayasari, A. D. (2023). Hak Eksekusi Kreditur Atas Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Bentuk Rahasia Dagang (Trade Secreet) Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Wicara, 12(4), 226–237. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/99150/51995
Chairunnisa, C., Sudirman, L., & Disemadi, H. S. (2024). Legal Framework for Trademark Manifestation as Collateral Financing to Enhance the Capacity of MSMEs in Indonesia. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum. 7(2), 137-46. https://publishing-widyagama.ac.id/ejournal-v2/index.php/yuridika/article/view/5117
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Contextualization of Legal Protection of Intellectual Property in Micro Small and Medium Enterprises in Indonesia. Law Reform, 18(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.42568
Dunn, J. D., & Seiler, P. F. (2007). Trade Secrets and Non-Traditional Categories of Intellectual Property as Collateral. Second International Colloquium on Secured Transactions: Security Interests in Intellectual Property Rights, 1–11. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/seiler.pdf
Fakhri Ali, M., & Triono, D. (2021). Literatur Review Penilaian Kekayaan Intelektual: Berdasarkan Buku Intellectual Property Karya Gordon Dan Russell. Indonesian Rich Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31092/irj.v2i2.33
Fazri Elfikri, N., Utama, A. S., & Primadya, M. (2022). The Urgency of Regulations for the Exercise of Copyright as a Fiduciary Collateral. Legal Brief, 11(5), 2722–4643. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal
Gusti, I., Ayu, A., & Marthavira, P. (2020). Patents as Fiduciary Collaterial in Bank Credit. Jurnal Notariil, 5(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.4.2.1208.65-72
Hamidaturrahim, R., Wilodati, & Wulandari, P. (2023). Pemberdayaan UMKM Melalui Pendampingan Legalitas Usaha Di Desa Cikahuripan, Lembang. Society : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37802/society.v4i1.371
Jonandi Effendi, J. I. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Depok : Prenandamedia Goup.
Karjunapradja, G. I., & Wahyuni, R. (2024). The Urgency of Directorate General of Intellectual Property In Valuing Intellectual Property Collateral Objects: Opportunities And Challenges. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 8(3), 552–569. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ/article/view/42714
Khaerunnisa, R. (2024, July 25). BRI: Porsi Kredit UMKM Capai 81,96 persen Hingga Triwulan II 2024. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4215279/bri-porsi-kredit-umkm-capai-8196-persen-hingga-triwulan-ii-2024
Lamijan, L., & Tohari, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Rahasia Perusahaan Melalui Sistem Rahasia Dagang. JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v4i1.458
Leawoods, H. (2000). Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2(1). https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol2/iss1/16
Limasento, H. (2023, August 24). Dorong UMKM Naik Kelas dan Go Export, Pemerintah Siapkan Ekosistem Pembiayaan yang Terintegrasi. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5318/dorong-umkm-naik-kelas-dan-go-export-pemerintah-siapkan-ekosistem-pembiayaan-yang-terintegrasi
Mumpuni, H. S. (2020, December 12). Pemanfaatan Metode Pemeringkatan Kualitas (Rangking Analysis) Untuk Penilaian Dengan Pendekatan Pasar. Kementerian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/13576/Pemanfaatan-Metode-Pemeringkatan-Kualitas-Rangking-Analysis-Untuk-Penilaian-Dengan-Pendekatan-Pasar.html
Muslih, M. (2013). Negara Hukum Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch. Legalitas, 4(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v4i1.117
Nugroho, M. C. P., & Salam, A. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Mekanisme Valuasi Hak Cipta Film sebagai Jaminan Fidusia pada Negara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Lex Patrimonium, 3(2), 1–19. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/lexpatri/vol3/iss2/3
Putri, S. B. S. R. W. (2024). Analisis Teori Tujuan Hukum Gustav Radbruch Dalam Kedudukan Majelis Penyelesaian Perselisihan Medis dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 8(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v8i2.3463
Qurniasari, A. N., & Santoso, B. (2023). Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Aset Bisnis dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan di Era Ekonomi Kreatif. Notarius, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i3.41408
Radbruch, G. (1932). Legal Philosophy.
Rizkiawan, T. (2022). Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Perbankan: Prospek dan Kendala. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(4), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss4.art13
Sampedro, R. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Carreteras, 4(232). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003080220-8
Sari, P. M. (2023). Problematika Valuasi Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5307–5320.
Singh, S., & Ru, J. (2023). Goals of sustainable infrastructure, industry, and innovation: a review and future agenda for research. In Environmental Science and Pollution Research (Vol. 30, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25281-5
Supriyanto, B. E. (2024, December 9). Mendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi lewat KUR dan Insentif UMKM. Kementerian Keuangan RI Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan. https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/kppn/watampone/id/data-publikasi/artikel/3796-mendorong-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-lewat-kur-dan-insentif-umkm.html
Syafrida, S., Hartati, R., Marbun, M., & Sinaga, H. (2023). Produk Ekonomi Kreatif Berbasis Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Perbankan. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i1.28603
Tan, D. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(2). http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/article/view/5601
Timur, W. (2018). Analisis Efektifitas Perlindungan Rahasia Dagang Dalam Perspektif Pidana. Jurnal Meta Yuridis. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v1i1.2904
Wayan Nilandari, N., & Aras Samsithawrati, P. (2023). Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia: Perspektif Keabsahan Hukum dan Mekanisme Penilaian. Acta Comitas Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 8(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i02.p9
Weley, N. C., Agustianto, A., Afdal, W., Dibah, N. F., & Ayunda, S. (2024). Watermark dalam Media Digital: Rezim Hak Cipta Melalui Teori Utilitarianisme & Perlindungan Hukum. Barelang Journal of Legal Studies, 2(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.37253/barjoules.v2i2.10237
Yanova, M. hendri, Komarudin, P., & Hadi, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Analisis Problematika Hukum Dengan Metode Penelitian Normatif Dan Empiris. Badamai Law Journal Magister Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 8(2). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.32801/damai.v8i2.17423
Zulfikar Abdillah, R. (2024). Implementation of Copyright in Intellectual Property Law As A Credit Guarantee Object in Banks based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 7(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.36733/yusthima.v4i1
