IP-Driven Fiduciary Security and Legal Certainty: Confronting Challenges in Indonesia’s Law of Obligations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/barjoules.v3i2.11386Keywords:
Fiduciary Security, Intellectual Property Rights, Legal Certainty, Law of Obligations, Creative EconomyAbstract
The key legal problem in this study lies in the lack of regulatory clarity and valuation standards for using Intellectual Property (IP) as an object of fiduciary security, which undermines legal certainty and creditor protection in Indonesia’s law of obligations. This research aims to analyze the legal framework and propose normative solutions to strengthen the enforceability of IP-driven fiduciary security. Using a normative legal research method with a statute-based approach, this study examines relevant laws including the Fiduciary Security Law (Law No. 42/1999), the Mortgage Law (Law No. 4/1996), and the Creative Economy regulations (PP No. 24/2022), supported by Radbruch’s theory of legal certainty and Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive legal theory. The findings reveal that although Indonesian law recognizes IP as a transferable intangible asset eligible for fiduciary security, implementation remains limited due to the absence of standardized valuation procedures, fragmented regulations, and uncertain execution mechanisms. Financial institutions remain reluctant to accept IP as collateral, fearing difficulty in enforcing and liquidating such assets. This research underscores the need for revising the Fiduciary Security Law to integrate explicit provisions for IP-based collateral, establishing accredited IP valuation services, and linking fiduciary and IP registration systems to ensure transparency and predictability. Strengthening these regulatory and institutional frameworks would enhance creditor confidence, improve debtor access to financing, and promote the use of IP as a legitimate economic asset in Indonesia’s law of obligations, thereby contributing to the growth of the creative economy and fostering innovation.
Downloads
References
Adnyani, N. K. S., Landrawan, I. W., & Dewa Ayu Eka Agustini. (2024). Regulating Constitutional Complaint Cases Is The Authority Of The Constitutional Court. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan (Civics), 21. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i1.66414
Agustianto, A., Disemadi, H. S., Hariyanto, O. I. B., & Sihombing, D. A. (2024). Special Intellectual Property Protection for Traditional Cultural Expressions: Rectifying Broad Legal Approaches. Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat, 24(1), 37-46.
Aprilia, N., Fahimah, I., & Darussalam, H. (2024). Analisis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Utang Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2. https://doi.org/10.29300/at-tasharruf.v2i2.6301
Aspan, H. (2024). Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan / Agunan dalam Pemberian Fasilitas Kredit oleh Lembaga Keuangan. 4, 19172–19184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.16636
Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
C., F. G. (2024). Tantangan Profesi Hukum Dalam Melindungi Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Di Era Digital. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 13.
Chairunnisa, C., Sudirman, L., & Disemadi, H. S. (2019). Legal Framework for Trademark Manifestation as Collateral Financing to Enhance the Capacity of MSMEs in Indonesia. Widya Yuridka: Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 137-46. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i2.5117
Dalimunthe, S. N. I. S., & Wahyuni, R. (2023). Perkembangan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Kredit Perbankan. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 14x.
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
Disemadi, H. S., Chutia, U., Afdal, W., Taniady, V., & Tan, D. (2025). Reconstructing The Legal Framework Of Trade Secret Protection Vis-À-Vis Cyber Theft: A Cross-Jurisdictional Comparative Study. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 16(1), 166-200. https://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jurisdictie/article/view/32563
Febriani, K. A., & Sarjana, I. M. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Kekayaan Intelektual yang Dibebankan Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia dari Perspektif Ekonomi Kreatif. 2(4), 1–10.
Gudiato, C., Sediyono, E., & Sembiring, I. (2022). Analisis Sistem E-Commerce Pada Shopee Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Menggunakan Metode S.W.O.T. JIFOTECH(Journal Of InformationTechnology), 2. https://doi.org/10.46229/jifotech.v2i1.294
Hanum, F., & Dewi, A. T. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemberi Fidusia Dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Kendaraan Bermotor Roda Empat. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Law Jurnal, 3. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i1.2295
Imam, R. R., Rachmad, B. A., & Istislam, S. B. (2023). Legal Certainty On The Legality Of Establishment Of Limited Company Based On Fairness Of Pancasila. RJOAS: Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2023-02.02
Kurniawan, I. D. (2024). The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Perspective of Legal Positivism. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies, 3.
Lubis, U. S. (2020). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Wakaf. Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 1. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v1i1.18
Lie, C., Royce, C., Rahman, M. P., Istiqomah, N., Aurelia, J., & Disemadi, H. S. (2024). Legal Insights on Symbolism in Traditional Architecture: Protecting Batam’s “Kampung Tua”. Journal of Judicial Review, 26(2), 209-226. https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jjr/article/view/9850
Manalu, L., Farhana, W. A., Agustin, Y. P., & Suhendar. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Aset Hak Kekayaan Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Perseroan Terbatas (PT). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Keadilan, 2.
Nursalim, I. F., Amaris, K., Agustianto, A., Suwardi, S., & Indrajaya, I. (2024). Protecting Industrial Design Rights: A Strategic Tool for Global Market Competitiveness. Barelang Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 88-102. https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/barjoules/article/view/10179
Prasja, T. R., Suriaatmadja, T. T., & Syafrinaldi. (2023). Kedudukan Dan Pemenuhan Unsur Asuransi Pada BPJS Kesehatan Perspektif Teori Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 6. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v6i2.9290
Pujiono, P., Suhartini, E., Martin, A. Y., & Sihotang, S. (2025). Pengembangan Model Pengikatan Jaminan Fidusia Dari Objek Bangunan Gedung Untuk Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 17. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v17i1.10730
Purwaningsih, E., Chikmawati, N. F., & Anisariza, N. U. (2020). Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Upaya Mendapatkan Kredit Pada Lembaga Keuangan.
Raja, E. D. T. L., Fauzi, A. P., Alsa, B., Sabila, & Firdaus, M. A. N. (2021). Eksekusi Benda Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konseptual Dalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 8.
Ramdan, M., & Zahrulswendar, I. H. (2021). Employment Social Insurance Arrangements For Online Transportation Drivers Based On A Progressive Legal Perpective. Awang Long Law Review, 4. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v4i1.245
Ratna, M. Y. A., & Sari, R. Y. P. (2020). Tantangan Pemanfaatan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Solusi Permodalan. Law Review, 20.
https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v20i2.2671
Reskin, G. W. K., & Wirdyaningsih. (2022). Pengaturan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Utang Menurut PP Nomor 24 Tahun 2022. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 8. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i4.
Ridho, M. R. (2024). Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank.
Rizkiathallah, G. T., & Purwanto, A. M. D. C. (2024). Keabsahan Surat Persetujuan Pengeluaran Barang Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Gorontalo Law Review, 7.
Santoso, T. G. (2024). Analisa Hukum atas Pengaturan Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Journal Of Intellectual Property (JIPRO), 7. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art3
Sudjana, M. (2013). Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Kebendaan Bergerak Dikaitkan Dengan Pengembangan Obyek Fidusia. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 24(3), 405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4
Situmeang, A., Disemadi, H. S., & Fitri, W. (2024). Peran Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Menggerakkan Industri Kreatif Pariwisata Berkelanjutan: Indonesia vs. Filipina. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law of Journal), 13(2), 384-402.
Tan, D. (2021). Metode penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan penelitian Hukum. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(5), 1332–1336.
Tantowi, A. (2022). Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Pemberian Kredit Bank Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip 5C. “Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(2), 581–592. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/4
Wulandari, S., & Fokky Fuad, S. (2024). Valuasi Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Jaminan Fidusia. Binamulia Hukum, 13. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.972
Yuliandari, S. (2022). Jaminan Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual: Analisis Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 11. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v11i2.2800
Zakaria, Z., Sudirman, & Umar, W. (2023). Penggunaan Properti Virtual sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia:Potensi Dan Tantangan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 7. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v7i1.10
