Legal Safeguards for Consumer Collateral Protection at Pawnshops in Indonesia

Authors

  • Neha Aswin Maysura Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia
  • Lu Sudirman Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia
  • Xavier Nugraha Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Go Chin Tjwan National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan
  • Winda Fitri Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37253/barjoules.v1i2.8864

Keywords:

Legal Safeguards, Collateral Assets, Pledges

Abstract

PT. Pegadaian is a public service provider that, in general, engages in pawn transactions to secure outstanding debts. In the pawn process, consumers have a right acquired by the party holding a claim on a movable property, which is provided to PT by the debtor. As a civil right, customers need to assert their rights independently through various legal channels and civil law institutions established by the state. This research is conducted to understand the legal protection of consumer collateral at PT. Pegadaian. The research method applied is a type of normative legal research that relatively projects the image of law as a prescriptive field that merely assesses law through its normative perspectives, which, of course, have a prescriptive nature. The approach used is the statute approach. The research results show that in cases of loss or damage to pawn collateral, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) issued POJK Number 31/POJK.05/2016 concerning Pawn Business in 2016. According to this regulation, all items that can be pledged are insurable under pawn law to ensure the availability of the collateral. According to Article 25 of Financial Services Regulation No. 31/POJK.05/2016, PT. Pegadaian will compensate for the damage or loss of consumer collateral caused by the negligence of PT. Pegadaian, whether in the form of goods or money.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Islami, M., Iman, C. H., & Zubaedah, R. (2021). Aspek Hukum atas Rusaknya Barang Jaminan di PT. Pegadaian (Persero) dan Perlindungan Hukumnya. Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani), 11, 193-206.
Rubiyanti, T. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Jumlah Nasabah, Pendapatan dan Harga Emas terhadap Tingkat Penyaluran Gadai Syariah (RAHN) pada PT Pegadaian (Persero) Per Tahun 2012-2017. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, Akuntansi, dan Perbankan, 3(1), 31-55.
Suwarni, E. S. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Nasabah Pegadaian Dalam Hal Terjadi Pelelangan Terhadap Barang Jaminan (Studi Kasus di Perum Pegadaian Cabang Surakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Partahi, F. E. F., Nasution, B., Sunarmi, S., & Siregar, M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Investor Terhadap Produk Investasi Emas Di Pegadaian (Studi Pada PT. Pegadaian (Persero) Cabang Kisaran). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 522-528, https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v2i3.169
Disemadi, H. S., & Regent, R. (2021). Urgensi Suatu Regulasi yang Komprehensif Tentang Fintech Berbasis Pinjaman Online Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 7(2), 605-618, https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i2.37991
Narasanti, I. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pt. Pegadaian (Persero) Dalam Hal Barang Jaminan Gadai Bukan Milik Debitur. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 5(1), 69 - 82. doi:10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i01.p07
Siregar, P. A. (2020). Akibat Hukum Pelelangan Objek Jaminan Gadai Oleh Kreditur Tanpa Adanya Peringatan Terhadap Nasabah Oleh Perum Pegadaian. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 1(1), 21-30, https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v1i1.17

Published

2023-11-20

Most read articles by the same author(s)