Author Guidelines

1. General Information

Manuscripts submitted to this journal must be original works that have not been previously published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Authors are responsible for ensuring the authenticity and integrity of their submissions. Articles may be written in clear and proper English or Bahasa Indonesia using formal academic language. All submitted manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer-review process conducted by at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the topic. The editorial board reserves the right to edit manuscripts for format consistency and clarity without altering their scientific content.

2. Manuscript Preparation

The manuscript should be prepared using Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) format with a length of 6–15 pages, including tables, figures, and references. The page format is A4 (21 × 29.7 cm) with margins of 3 cm on all sides, using Times New Roman, 12 pt font size, 1.15 line spacing, and a 1 cm indentation for each new paragraph. Authors are encouraged to write concisely and clearly, avoiding ambiguous expressions or unnecessary jargon. Uncommon abbreviations must be defined at first mention. The use of standardized units and SI symbols is required throughout the manuscript.

A. Original Research Article

An original research article presents scientific findings that are original, significant, and scientifically reliable. The manuscript must be structured systematically and include the following sections: Title, Author Names and Affiliations, Abstract and Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Acknowledgments (optional), and References. The title should be concise, clear, and not exceed 15 words. Author names must be written in full without academic titles, accompanied by institutional affiliations and the corresponding author’s email address.

The abstract should be written in both Indonesian and English, consisting of 150–250 words that summarize the background, objectives, methods, main results, and conclusions, followed by 3–5 keywords. The introduction should describe the background, problem statement, and research objectives. The methods section must provide a detailed explanation of the study design, materials and equipment used, procedures, and data analysis techniques to ensure reproducibility.

The results should be presented systematically in text, tables, or figures, and discussed in the discussion section, which interprets the findings, compares them with relevant literature, and explains their implications. The conclusion should summarize the key findings and provide suggestions for future research. Acknowledgments are optional and may be directed to institutions or individuals who contributed to the research. References must follow the Vancouver style, with a minimum of 15 references, of which at least 80% should be from primary sources published within the last 10 years.

B. Review Article / Systematic Review

A review article includes two main types: narrative review and systematic review. Both aim to provide a comprehensive summary, critical analysis, and synthesis of the current scientific knowledge on a specific topic relevant to health and biomedical sciences. A narrative review generally focuses on conceptual explanations, theoretical perspectives, or recent developments in a field, whereas a systematic review employs a structured and transparent methodology to identify, evaluate, and synthesize relevant research findings based on clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The general structure of a review article consists of Title, Author Names and Affiliations, Abstract and Keywords, Introduction, Methods (required for systematic review), Main Content, Conclusion, Acknowledgment (optional), and References. The title should be concise and informative, accurately reflecting the scope of the review. Author names and affiliations are written as in research articles. The abstract, written in 150–250 words, should summarize the background, objectives, review methods (if a systematic review), major findings, and conclusions, followed by 3–5 keywords.

The Introduction should describe the background, significance, and rationale for the selected topic. For Systematic Reviews, the Methods section must be included, clearly explaining the literature search strategy (e.g., databases such as PubMed, Scopus, or Google Scholar), search period, keywords or MeSH terms used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the process of study selection and analysis. Authors are strongly encouraged to follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to ensure transparency and reporting quality.

The Main Content should be organized thematically, categorically, or based on the major findings of the included studies. Authors are expected to critically appraise each source, compare research outcomes, identify knowledge gaps, and highlight the scientific implications of the reviewed evidence. The Conclusion should provide a concise summary of the main findings, limitations of the review, and recommendations for future research directions. The Acknowledgment section is optional and may include recognition of institutional or individual contributions.

The References must be formatted according to the Vancouver style, with at least 30 references, the majority of which should be primary sources such as journal articles and recent publications (preferably within the last 10 years).

C. Case Report

A case report focuses on presenting clinical cases that are rare, unique, or provide significant contributions to scientific understanding or clinical practice. The structure of a case report includes the following sections: Title, Author Names and Affiliations, Abstract and Keywords, Introduction, Case Description, Discussion, Conclusion, Patient Consent, and References. The title should be clear and reflect the main condition or finding being reported. Author names and affiliations should follow the standard format.

The abstract, consisting of 150–200 words, must summarize the background of the case, intervention, and outcome, followed by 3–5 keywords. The introduction should explain the scientific or educational relevance of the case and include a brief literature review. The case description should provide detailed information on the patient’s history, clinical findings, diagnostic investigations, treatment, and outcomes, ensuring that patient identity remains confidential.

The discussion should relate the case to similar reports in the literature, emphasizing its uniqueness, clinical implications, or scientific contribution. The conclusion should highlight the key takeaway or educational message from the reported case. Each case report must include a patient consent statement, confirming that the patient or their legal guardian has provided written informed consent for publication. References must follow the Vancouver style, with 10–20 relevant and up-to-date sources.

4. Tables and Figures

All tables and figures must be cited in the manuscript text and numbered consecutively (e.g., Table 1, Figure 1). Table titles should be placed above the tables, while figure captions should appear below the figures. Both titles and captions must be written in sentence case and clearly describe the presented data. Tables should be formatted neatly using horizontal lines only, avoiding vertical or unnecessary borders. Figures must be of high resolution and easily readable in both online and printed formats. Each figure and table must be self-explanatory and, if reproduced or adapted from other sources, must include proper citation and permission. The total number of figures allowed in a manuscript is a maximum of seven (7), unless additional figures are approved by the editorial board due to exceptional scientific necessity.

5. Publication Ethics

Authors must ensure that their manuscripts are free from plagiarism and falsification. All submissions will be screened using plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin, with a similarity limit of 20%. For studies involving humans or animals, authors are required to include a statement of ethical approval obtained from an appropriate ethics committee. Any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation of the results must be declared in the manuscript. Authors are also expected to comply with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

6. Submission and Review Process

Manuscripts should be submitted through the journal’s official Open Journal Systems (OJS) website. Authors must register as “Author” users before uploading their manuscripts. The editorial team will conduct an initial assessment to ensure the submission fits the journal’s scope and formatting requirements. Manuscripts passing this stage will be sent for double-blind peer review. The review process typically takes 4–8 weeks, and authors may be asked to revise their manuscripts based on reviewers’ comments before a final decision is made. The final acceptance of the manuscript depends on the reviewers’ recommendations and the editorial board’s judgment.

7. Citation Style and References

References should primarily come from peer-reviewed journals published within the last ten years. Each manuscript must contain at least 15 references, with at least 80% from primary sources such as journal articles or research reports. The journal follows Vancouver referencing style, depending on the editorial policy. Authors are strongly encouraged to use reference management tools such as Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote for consistency.

8. Publication Fee

The journal does not charge any fees at any stage of the publication process. Both submission and article processing are completely free of charge (APC free). Authors will not be required to pay for submission, peer review, editing, or online publication. This policy aims to support open access publication and encourage wider dissemination of scientific knowledge without financial barriers.