Determinant Analysis of Company Debt Policy with Vector Error Correction Model Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/gfa.v6i1.6547Keywords:
Debt Policy, Managerial Ownership, Sales Growth, Free Cash Flow, Asset Structure, Vector Error Correction ModelAbstract
Purpose- This study uses a VECM model that aims to see the short-run and long-term effects of managerial ownership, sales growth, free cash flow, and asset structure against debt policy. Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) is a model that can be used for time series data that is not stationary but has a cointegration relationship where in the model included stationary exogenous variables as additional regressors.
Research Method- The sample used in this research is quantitative data with a purposive sampling technique. Based on the criteria, the number of samples collected is 32 samples in the period 2013-2021.The data analysis techniques in this study use Vector Error Correlation Model (VECM) analysis, several stages that researchers must go through before determining the right model, namely data stationarity test, optimal lag length test, co-integration test, VAR model stability test, granger causality analysis, VAR/VECM empirical model, Impulse Response Function analysis and Variance Decomposition analysis.
Findings- The results of the analysis show that in the short term only sales growth and asset structure have a significant influence on debt policy. Meanwhile, in the long-term free cash flow, asset structure and sales growth have a significant influence on debt policy, while managerial ownership has an insignificant effect on debt policy.
Implication- For the company should reduce the proportion of funding from debt in the implementation of its operations so as to reduce financial distress, because funding from corporate debt causes financial distress and agency costs greater than tax savings from debt interest expense, as a result of which the company is very vulnerable to economic turmoil. For creditors who provide sources of debt funding, pay more attention to aspects of the company's asset structure to be used as collateral for debt, because the company usually uses loan funds for high-risk projects. For investors should take deeper considerations to invest in companies that have large free cash flow because companies that have large free cash flow tend to show good cash flow for the future.
Downloads
References
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2001). M. K. B. 1 Edisi 8. J. E. (2011). No Title. Manajemen Keuangan. Buku 1 Edisi 8.
Destriana, Y. (2010). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 12(1), 1–16. Https://Doi.Org/10.25105/Jmat.V1i1.4904
Hardiningsih, P., & Oktaviani, R. M. (2012). Determinan Kebijakan Hutang (Dalam Agency Theory Dan Pecking Order Theory). Dinamika Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Perbankan Universitas Stikubank, 1(1), 11–24.
Harjito, D. A. (2011). Teori Pecking Order Dan Trade-Off Dalam Analisis Struktur Modal Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 15(2), 187–196. Https://Doi.Org/10.20885/Jsb.Vol15.Iss2.Art3
Hasan, M. A. (2014). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Free Cash Flow Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kebijakan Utang (Studi Pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan Industri Dasar Dan Kimia Yang Terdaftar Di Bei). Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(1), 90–100.
Lina, S. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 13(3), 163–181.
Naray, A. R., & Mananeke, L. (2015). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Penjualan, Struktur Aktiva Dan Ukuran Penjualan Terhadap Struktur Modal Pada Bank Pemerintah Kategori Buku 4. Jurnal Emba, 3(2), 896–906.
Nofriani, I. (2015). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Pertumbuhan Penjualan, Pertumbuhan Aset, Dan Likuiditas Terhadap Struktur Modal Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2013. Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang.
Purnianti, N., & Putra, I. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Kebijakan Utang Perusahaan Non Keuangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 14(1), 91–117.
Setiani, R. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional Dan Free Cash Flow Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang (Studi Terhadap Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2015). Skripsi Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis. Http://Repositori.Uin-Alauddin.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/15228
Sheisarvian, R. (2015). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kebijakan Dividen Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Tercatat Di Bei Periode 2010-2012). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis S1 Universitas Brawijaya, 22(1), 85888.
Suastawan, I. (2014). Pengaruh Arus Kas Bebas Dan Profitabilitas Pada Kebijakan Utang Perusahaan Real Estate Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(3), 685–694.
Susanti; Mayangsari, S. (2014). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jorunal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 1(1), 29–50.
Susanti, F. (2013). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Kebijakan Deviden, Struktur Aset, Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010-2013. Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji, Tanjungpinang, 66(1997), 37–39.
Susilawati; Agustina, L. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memperngaruhi Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal Universitas Krsiten Maranatha, 53(9), 1689–1699. Http://Publications.Lib.Chalmers.Se/Records/Fulltext/245180/245180.Pdf%0ahttps://Hdl.Handle.Net/20.500.12380/245180%0ahttp://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jsames.2011.03.003%0ahttps://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Gr.2017.08.001%0ahttp://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Precamres.2014.12.0
Tjeleni, I. (2013). Kepemilikan Manajerial Dan Institusional Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(3), 129–139. Https://Doi.Org/10.35794/Emba.V1i3.1949
Trisnawati, I. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 18(1), 33–42. Https://Doi.Org/10.34208/Jba.V19i2.278
Yuniarti, A. M. D. (2013). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Dividen, Profitabilitas Dan Struktur Aset Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Accounting Analysis Journal, 2(4), 447–454. Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Aaj.V2i4.4171
