STUDY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE LEVEL IN MAJALENGKA CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/leader.v2i1.9525Keywords:
Transportation, Public Transportation, Level of ServiceAbstract
In Majalengka, there are only a few public transportation options, including Angkutan Kota (public minivans), online motorcycle taxis (Ojek Online), and even traditional becak (pedicabs) can still be found in the city. The absence of trains and the limited number of public minivans may contribute to the lack of attractiveness of public transportation in Majalengka. Even in urban areas of Majalengka, some regions cannot be reached by public minivans. This study aims to evaluate the level of public transportation service to the community, providing evidence of the quality of public transportation services in Majalengka Kota. The research methodology employed in this study is quantitative. Majalengka Kota serves as the central government area of Kabupaten Majalengka, making it the hub of activities for its residents. This is due to the presence of various facilities that make Majalengka Kota a centre for activities, including recreational centres, food centres, favourite schools, etc. In conclusion, the Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) in this study is 68%, which falls into the satisfactory category. The comparison of the importance and performance levels of transportation services shows a minimal GAP of 0.094, which is still positive, indicating a satisfactory and secure level of service. Lastly, the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) graph identifies two variables, Administration (A) and Going (G), as the main priorities for improvement. The government should address these areas to anticipate and enhance future transportation services.
Downloads
References
References
AllenMassingue, S., & Oviedob, D. (2022). Walkability and the Right to the city: A snapshot critique of pedestrian. Research in Transportation Economics, 86, 1-87.
Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Skoufas, A., Zeglis, D., Andronis, C., & Basbas, S. (2022). Perceived pedestrian level of service: the case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Transportation research procedia, 60, 124-131.
Çelikbilek, Y., Moslem, S., & Duleba, S. (2022). A combined grey multi criteria decision making model to evaluate public transportation systems. Evolving Systems, , 1-15.
Firmansyah, F., Rifai, A. I., & Taufik, M. (2022). The Performance of Roundabouts with Traffic Signals: A Case Kadipaten Intersection, Indonesia A Case Kadipaten Intersection, Indonesia. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(5), 823-832.
Ismawanda, & Zajuli, A. (2018). Analisis Kemacetan Lalu Lintas Di Simpang Empat Legundi Kabupaten Gresik. Swara Bhumi E-Journal Pendidikan Geografi FIS Unesa, 273–242.
Jawed, A., Talpur, M. A., Chandio, I. A., & Mahesar, P. N. (2019). Impacts of In-Accessible and Poor Public Transportation System on Urban Enviroment: Evidence from Hyderabad, Pakistan. Engineering. Technology & Applied Science Research, 9(2), 3896-389.
Johanes, A., Dermawan, W. B., Isradi, M., & Rifai, A. I. (2022). Analysis of the Satisfaction Level of Sidewalk Users:(Case Study on Jl Jendral Ahmad Yani Bekasi). ADRI International Journal of Engineering and Natural Science, 7(1), 74-82.
Kopylova, T. M. (2018). A Level-of-Service concept regarding intermodal hubs of urban public passenger transport. Transportation research procedia, 36, , 303-307.
Li, D., Zhang, Y., & Li, C. (2019). Mining public opinion on transportation systems based on social media data. Sustainability, 11(15), 4016.
Lucchesi, S. T., Tavares, V. B., Rocha, M. K., & Larranaga, A. M. (2022). Public transport COVID-19-safe: New barriers and policies to implement effective countermeasures under user’s safety perspective. Sustainability, 14(5), 2945.
Massobrio, R., & Nesmachnow, S. (2020). Urban data analysis for the public transportation system of Montevideo, Uruguay. In Smart Cities: Second Ibero-American Congress, ICSC-CITIES 2019, Soria, Spain, October 7–9, 2019. Revised Selected Papers 2, 199-214.
Naveen, B. R., & Gurtoo, A. (2022). Public transport strategy and epidemic prevention framework in the Context of Covid-19. Transport Policy, 116, 165-174.
Oeschger, G., Carroll, P., & Caulfield, B. (2020). Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89, 102628.
Purnama, E., Rifai, A. I., & Nasrun, N. (2022). Analysis of Road Performance Used Indonesian Highway Capacity Manual 1997: A Case Jalan KH Abdul Halim Majalengka-Indonesia. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(5), 888-895.
Rifai, A. I., Prasetyo, E., & Rhismono. (2021). Analysis of Community Satisfaction Level on the Road Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project (Learn from Palu Disasters Area). In International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering, 297-309.
Rifai, A. I., Ramadhan, A. H., Isradi, M., & Dermawan, W. B. (2021). Analysis of Pedestrian Facility Services on Shopping Mall Area in Satellite City During Pandemic COVID-19. ADRI International Journal of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 99-10.
Sazu, M. H., & Jahan, S. A. (2022). High efficiency public transportation system: role of big data in making recommendations. Journal of process management and new technologies, 10(3-4), 9-21.
Shu, S., Bian, Y., Zhao, L., Rong, J., & Liu, X. (2021). Modelling pedestrian level of service on sidewalks with multi-factors based on different pedestrian flow rates. Transport, 36(6), 486-498.
Wincent, W., Rifai, A. I., & Isradi, M. (2022). The Road Performance Analysis in Jalan Ahmad Yani Batam Using IHCM 1997. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 1(1), 103-116.
Zhang, X., Zhang, Q., Sun, T., Zou, Y., & Chen, H. (2018). Evaluation of urban public transport priority performance based on the improved TOPSIS method: A case study of Wuhan. Sustainable cities and society, 43, , 357-365.
.png){kind=small}
