METODE EVALUATIF DALAM PROGRAM UPGRADING PERMUKIMAN KUMUH DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/jad.v6i2.11234Keywords:
program evaluation, slum settlements, upgrading, literatur review, evaluative approachAbstract
Various slum upgrading programs in Indonesia such as KIP, P2KKP, and KOTAKU have been implemented to improve environmental conditions and basic infrastructure. However, the outcomes of these programs show considerable variation, both in terms of physical achievements and their impact on community life. Several studies note that physical improvements are not always followed by behavioral changes or enhancements in residents’ quality of life. This highlights the need for evaluation approaches that assess not only physical aspects but also consider social, economic, and institutional dimensions comprehensively. This study aims to examine various evaluation methods used in previous studies on slum upgrading programs in Indonesia. A systematic literature review was conducted on 18 relevant academic articles, using the PRISMA approach for filtering and bibliographic visualization analysis through VOSviewer. These articles were analyzed based on the evaluation approach used, underlying principles and criteria, and the appropriateness of each method in relation to the location and timing of program implementation. The findings indicate four main types of evaluative approaches: (1) input-output or physical indicator-based, (2) outcome-based, (3) participatory, and (4) context-based. Each approach has its own focus, strengths, and limitations. To address the complex challenges in slum settlements, combining physical and social evaluation approaches is considered more relevant, especially in areas with unique characteristics. Flexible and context-sensitive evaluation methods are essential to ensure that upgrading programs truly benefit communities in the long term.
Downloads
References
Alam, P., Selatan, S., Oktuwar, D., Nurkukuh, D. K., & Priyoga, I. (2021). Efektivitas Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh ( KOTAKU ) Sebagai Upaya Pengentasan Permukiman Kumuh. 2(283), 1–10.
Ariana, N., & Karyawan, I. D. M. A. (2023). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Penyediaan Infrastruktur Permukiman Pada Program Kotaku Di Kelurahan Pancor Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Ganec Swara, 17(2), 657. Https://Doi.Org/10.35327/Gara.V17i2.470
Dainty Grace Putry, Eni, S. P., Wijaya, E. S., & Jura, C. A. B. (2023). Konservasi Dan
Revitalisasi Kawasan Bantaran Sungai Ciliwung Di Kelurahan Manggarai, Kecamatan Tebet, Jakarta Selatan. Journal Of Architectural Design And Development, 4(2), 186–201. Https://Doi.Org/10.37253/Jad.V4i2.8602
Dianingrum, A. (2017). Perkembangan Program Perbaikan Kampung Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Di Surabaya. In Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. Https://Core.Ac.Uk/Download/Pdf/291463663.Pdf
Faridl, D. M., Hadinata, I. Y., Mentayani, I., & Mahyudin, I. (2023). Evaluasi Ruang Bantaran Sungai Pasca Penataan Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kelayan Selatan Kota Banjarmasin Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Enviroscienteae, 19(3), 35. Https://Doi.Org/10.20527/Es.V19i3.17259
Fasikhi, F., Eni, S. P., & Sudarwani, M. M. (2023). Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Publik Menggunakan Good Public Space Index, Studi Kasus: Community Centre Pamulang. Journal Of Architectural Design And Development, 4(2), 120–132. Https://Doi.Org/10.37253/Jad.V4i2.8578
Florencetina, F., & Aditantri, R. (2022). Efektivitas Program Kampung Deret Berdasarkan Indikator Kotaku. Vitruvian : Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan Dan Lingkungan, 12(1), 13. Https://Doi.Org/10.22441/Vitruvian.2022.V12i1.002
Habsy, B. A. (2017). Seni Memehami Penelitian Kuliatatif Dalam Bimbingan Dan Konseling : Studi Literatur. Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, 1, 90–100. Https://Doi.Org/10.31100/Jurkam.V1i2.56
Huda Ahmad Sabili, Nuzullani Isma, Maulidah Siti Alvina, Kusuma Riyan Wijaya, & Kurniawan Irvan Arif. (2023). Kronologis Kebijakan Program Penanganan Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh Di Indonesia Dari Tahun 1969-2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 115–128. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Jptam.V7i1.5270
Manurung, H. (2019). Dampak Penataan Permukiman Kumuh Terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Hidup Masyarakat Di Kawasan Bagan Deli Belawan (The Impacts Of Slum Structuring On The Increase In People’S Quality Of Life At Bagan Deli, Belawan). Inovasi, 16(1), 1–10. Https://Doi.Org/10.33626/Inovasi.V16i1.128
Marzuki, M., Setianto, Y. A., & Sodikin, S. (2023). Evaluasi Strategi Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh Dalam Mendukung Peningkatan Kualitas Lingkungan Hidup Di Kelurahan Karang Anyar Pantai Kota Tarakan. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 11(3), 780–790. Https://Doi.Org/10.26418/Jtllb.V11i3.69449
Moninggar, S. T., & Septanaya, I. D. M. F. (2025). Evaluating The Impact Of Infrastructure Interventions On Quality Of Life: A Case Study Of The City Without Poorer Areas Program (KOTAKU) In Surakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science, 1498(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.1088/1755-1315/1498/1/012012
Nursyamsu, L., Gunawan, G. N. A., Pinassang, J. L., Khairi, M. Z., Artanti, N. K., Caroline, J., & Oliver, A. J. (2023). Analisis Kepuasan Pengunjung Terhadap Kualitas Infrastruktur Wisata Pantai Kampung Tua Nongsa. Journal Of Architectural Design And Development, 4(2), 179–185. Https://Doi.Org/10.37253/Jad.V4i2.8586
Oktarini, M. F., Lussetyowati, T., & Primadella, P. (2022). Persepsi Pemukim Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Di Permukiman Kumuh Tepian Sungai Musi, Palembang. Jurnal Permukiman, 17(2), 85. Https://Doi.Org/10.31815/Jp.2022.17.85-92
Patubungan, Y. L., Rante, H., & Julison, B. (2022). Efektivitas Penanganan Luas Kawasan Kumuh Pada Program Kotaku (Kota Tanpa Kumuh) Di Kota Jayapura. Jurnal ELIPS (Ekonomi, Lingkungan, Infrastruktur, Pengembangan Wilayah, Dan Sosial Budaya), 5(2), 106–115. Https://Doi.Org/10.31957/Jurnalelips.V5i3.2405
Rahayu, T., Sudaryono, & Baiquni, M. (2003). Evaluasi Program Penataan Dan Rehabilitasi Permukiman Kumuh Studi Kasus Kawasan Bantaran Sungai Code Bagian Utara Yogyakarta. Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 10(2), 53–62. Http://Jpe-Ces.Ugm.Ac.Id/Ojs/Index.Php/JML/Article/View/334/262
Risna, L., Noer, M., & Aziz, R. (2022). Efektivitas Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kelurahan Batang Arau Kota Padang. Jurnal Rekayasa, 12(1), 59–71. Https://Doi.Org/10.37037/Jrftsp.V12i1.150
Sari Agistya Risna, & Ridlo Mohammad Agung. (2021). Studi Literature : Identifikasi Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Permukiman Kumuh Di Kawasan Perkotaan. Jurnal Kajian Ruang, 1(2), 160–176. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.30659/Jkr.V1i2.20022
Sasanto, R., & Khair, A. S. (2010). Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Penanganan Permukiman Ilegal Di Bantaran Sungai Studi Kasus: Bantaran Kali Pesanggrahan Kampung Baru, Kedoya Utara Kebon Jeruk. Jurnal Planesa, 1(2), 146–152.
Syamsiar, N. R., Surya, B., & Tato, S. (2020). Evaluasi Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh ( Studi Pada Penanganan Program Kotaku Kelurahan Banggae Kabupaten Majene ). Urban And Regional Studies Journal (URSJ), 2(2), 54–65. Https://Journal.Unibos.Ac.Id/Ursj/Article/View/324
Taji, A. B. (2021). Identifikasi Spasial Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kelurahan Semanggi Kota Surakarta. Syntax Idea, 3(9), 2038–2048. Https://Doi.Org/10.46799/Syntax-Idea.V3i9.1459
Umam, F. N., Pontoh, N. K., & Ermawati, M. (2022). Evaluasi Implementasi Program Neighborhood Upgrading And Shelter Project Phase 2 (Nusp-2) Di Kota Bandar Lampung (Studi Kasus: Kelurahan Kota Karang Raya Kecamatan Teluk Betung Timur). Jurnal Perencanaan Dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, 2(2), 103. Https://Doi.Org/10.35472/Jppk.V2i2.619
Widodo, A., & Riyadh SH M, A. U. B. (2022). Efektivitas Program Kotaku (Kota Tanpa Kumuh) Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. 2, 1–18.
Wiryanti, K. D., & Rudiarto, I. (2015). Evaluasi Rumah Susun Pekunden Berdasarkan Kaidah Layak Huni Dan Berkelanjutan. Ruang, 1(4), 231. Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Ruang.1.4.231-240
Yulia Fitri, Istijono Bambang, & Hidayat Benny. (2024). Efektivitas Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (Kotaku) Dalam Menangani Permukiman Kumuh Di Kota Padang. Jurnal Niara, 16(3), 624–651. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.31849/Niara.V16i3.18758
2.png){kind=small}
