The Boundaries of Implementing a Limited Right to Work for Foreign Refugees in Indonesia

Authors

  • Gede Yudi Sutrisna Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37253/conescintech.v6i1.12720

Keywords:

Foreign Refugees, Limited Right to Work, Presidential Regulation No. 125/2016, State Sovereignty, Local Job Market

Abstract

The employment ban on foreign refugees in Indonesia triggers protracted refugee situations, resulting in socioeconomic vulnerabilities. The concept of granting a limited right to work has emerged as a humanitarian solution; however, its implementation is constrained by various legal boundaries and state sovereignty. This study aims to analyze the juridical restrictions on implementing a limited right to work for foreign refugees in Indonesia and to formulate an ideal framework that balances humanitarian commitments with the protection of the domestic workforce. Utilizing a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a comparative approach, this study examines the harmonization between Presidential Regulation No. 125/2016 and national labor regulations. The results indicate that the primary obstacles to implementing a limited right to work in Indonesia stem from the lack of legal status for refugees as official Foreign Workers and the protectionism of the local job market under the Labor Law. This study concludes that a limited right to work can be implemented in Indonesia under strict conditions, including sector restrictions (limited to the informal sector or self-reliant creative economies), geographic boundaries, and a temporary nature during the resettlement waiting period. The government needs to adopt specific discretionary regulations to legalize this limited work scheme without compromising the economic rights of local citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahimbisibwe, F. (2024). Protracted refugee situations and the shrinking durable solutions: Could there be a ray of hope in local solutions? Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2395346. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2395346

Arthur-Ewusie, E. (2024). Has the non-refoulement principle acquired customary status in international law? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4824240

Dewansyah, B., & Nafisah, R. D. (2021). The constitutional right to asylum and humanitarianism in Indonesian law: “Foreign refugees” and PR 125/2016. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 8(3), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2021.8

Fikri, R. A., Rambe, M. J., & Fatmawati, I. (2023). John Rawls’ concept of justice as fairness and its relevance to the meaning of Pancasila social justice. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Community (ICIE) (pp. 105–110). Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi.

Karuni, K. D. (2023). International Legal Protection Study For Refugees Through The 1951 Refugee Convention And 1967 Protocol. Ganesha Law Review, 5(2), 10-20.

Kraler, A., Etzold, B., & Ferreira, N. (2024). Understanding the dynamics of protracted displacement. Forced Migration Review. https://www.fmreview.org/externalisation/kraler-etzold-ferreira/

Lukito, R. (2023). Pancasila as a national legal postulate: Re-conveying the rules of recognition. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 26(S5), 1–17.

Mangku, DGS, Yuliartini, NPR, Dewi, & Arta. (2022). Disclosure of crime cases through CCTV: How does technology help police performance? AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104107

Mangku, DGS, Yuliartini, NPR, Ruslan, R., Menteiro, S., & Surat, D. (2022). The Position of Indigenous People in the Culture and Tourism Developments: Comparing Indonesia and East Timor Tourism Law and Policies. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7 (1).

Missbach, A., & Adiputera, Y. (2018). Stalemate: Refugees in Indonesia and Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016. CILIS Policy Papers, Centre for Indonesian Law, Islam and Society, University of Melbourne.

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1–15.

Nola, L. F. (2020). Refugee employment prohibition in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Governance and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020). European Alliance for Innovation (EAI). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-7-2020.2303641

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). The principle of non-refoulement under international human rights law. United Nations.

Putri, G. C. (2022). The dilemma of hospitality: Revisiting Indonesia’s policy on handling refugees under international law. Jurnal HAM, 13(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.113-130

Sefriani, S. (2016). Legal Analysis on the Unilateral Withdrawal from International Trade Treaties in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics (JARLE), 7(17), 609-617.

Shepherd, N. J. (2025). Gig economy workers’ rights: Legal classification and social protection in digital labour markets. International Journal of Law and Societal Studies, 2(1), 24–35.

Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420–437.

Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The “gig economy”: Employee, self-employed, or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205.

Utama, I. G. A. A., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (ICC) Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Rohingnya Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 3(3), 208-219.

Wenar, L. (2021). John Rawls. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 ed.). Stanford University, Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/

Wiratmaja, I. G. N. A., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Maritime Boundary Delimitation Di Laut Karibia Dan Samudera Pasifik Antara Costa Rica Dan Nicaragua Melalui Mahkamah Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 2(1), 1-10.

Yuliartini, N. P. R., Mangku, D. G. S., & Kbarek, L. N. (2024). Customary law and justice: Protecting the rights of women victims of sexual violence in Bali. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.26555/jhn.v15i2.28542.

Yuliartini, NPR, Hartana, Mangku, DGS, Hadi, IGAA, & Arta, KS (2021). Legal Protection for Women and Children as Victims of Human Trafficking in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24 (1).

Published

2026-09-22