The The Impact of Digital Technology and Generation Z’s Characteristics on their Learning Preference-Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37253/combines.v6i1.12790Keywords:
Generation Z, Digital Technology, Learning PreferencesAbstract
The use of digital technology in the classroom is a notable innovation in higher education aimed at improving the quality of learning. However, there are obstacles to the successful integration of digital technology in higher education, including a lack of technological infrastructure, the requirement for qualified instructors, and the need to modify teaching strategies to accommodate the learning preferences of Generation Z. Thus, the goal of the systematic review was to look at the traits of Generation Z and how digital technology influences their choices for learning. This systematic review follows the PRISMA standards (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis). A specific protocol was used to guide the literature search in line with the review's goals, consisting of three main stages: identification, screening, and article inclusion. This protocol outlines pertinent details, including search keywords, the database to be utilised, and selection criteria. The review's findings demonstrate how educators can plan and create more engaging teaching strategies by having a deeper understanding of Generation Z's characteristics. The results indicate that the characteristics of Generation Z, such as their short attention span versus the high demand of fast-paced digital technology, have significantly influenced their learning preferences on digitised documentation, real-world case studies and immersive learning methods. Additionally, the interactive experiences provided by digital technology are well-suited to the characteristics and learning styles of Generation Z, making it easier for them to learn and overcome their learning challenges. Furthermore, educational institutions can enhance learning outcomes and experiences by creating digital learning models that are tailored to Generation Z.
Downloads
References
Alamäki, A., & Marttinen, K. (2021). Adopting artificial intelligence for the learning and teaching of Generation Z in higher education.https://esignals.fi/research/en/2021/06/24/adopting-artificial-intelligence-for-the-learning-and-teaching-of-generation-z-in-higher-education/
Aryadoust, V., Zakaria, A., & Jia, Y. (2024). Investigating the affordances of OpenAI’s large language model in developing listening assessments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100204
Cai, Q., Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2024). Factors influencing learner attitudes towards ChatGPT-assisted language learning in higher education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(22), 7112-7126. : https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725
Cain, C. C., Morgan Bryant, A., Buskey, C. D., & Meyers Ferguson, Y. (2022). Generation Z, learning preferences, and technology: An academic technology framework based on enterprise architecture. The Journal of the Southern Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/doi:10.17705/3JSIS.00019
Calabrese, J. (2023). A Pilot Study to Compare Lecture and Active Learning. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 7(2), 8.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). Deconstructing student perceptions of generative AI (GenAI) through an expectancy value theory (EVT)-based instrument. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01186. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6984-6360
Ding, N., Chen, M., & Hu, L. (2025). Examining the impact of big five personality traits on generation Z designers’ subscription to paid AI drawing tools using SEM and FsQCA. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 17587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02926-8
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239‑021‑00289‑4
Giray, L. (2022). Meet the centennials: Understanding the generation Z students. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 2(4), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.26
Gutersohn, C., Schweingruber, S., Haudenschild, M., Huber, M., Greif, R., & Fuchs, A. (2023). Medical device education: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing self-directed learning with traditional instructor-led learning on an anaesthesia workstation. BMJ open, 13(9), e070261.
Hanawi, S. A., Saat, N. Z. M., Hanafiah, H., Taufik, M. F. A. M., Nor, A. C. M., Hendra, A. K., ... & Azlan, T. N. A. I. (2022). Relationship between learning style and academic performance among the generation Z students in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal Of Pharmaceutical Research And Allied Sciences, 11(3-2022), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.51847/bznxqWIsQL
Hernández-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Educational experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 847-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9
Huilaja, L., Bur, E., Jokelainen, J., Sinikumpu, S. P., & Kulmala, P. (2022). The effectiveness and student perceptions of peer-conducted team-based learning compared to faculty-led teaching in undergraduate teaching. Advances in medical education and practice, 535-542.
Jayaputri, H. E. (2024). ChatGPT in action: Unraveling its impact on student motivation in English language learning. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 448-456. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/SCOPE/
Kim, K. (2024): Medical student needs for e-learning: Perspectives of Generation Z. – Korean Journal of Medical Education 36(4): 389-399. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.312
Kuleto, V., P, M. I., Stanescu, M., Ranković, M., Šević, N. P., Păun, D., & Teodorescu, S. (2021). Extended reality in higher education, a responsible innovation approach for generation y and generation z. Sustainability, 13(21), 11814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111814
Lai, J. W. (2024). Adapting self-regulated learning in an age of generative artificial intelligence chatbots. Future Internet, 16(6), 218.
Lochner, A. (2025). Student-lecturer interactions: Do traditional methods appeal to Generation Z students?. Perspectives in Education, 43(1), 19-35.
Mantha, M. S., & Krishna, P. V. (2024). A Literature Review of Learning Preferences, Motivational Factors and Training Needs Among Different Generations of Baby Boomers, Gen x, Gen y and Gen z Students and Professionals. Education and Society, 48(1), 53-64. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vamsi-Pratapa/publication/378129374_Education_and_Society
McCarthy, K. S., & Yan, E. F. (2024). Reading comprehension and constructive learning: Policy considerations in the age of artificial intelligence. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322231218891
Mehrvarz, M., Salimi, G., Abdoli, S., & McLaren, B. M. (2025). How does students' perception of ChatGPT shape online learning engagement and performance?. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100459.
Nicholas, A. J. (2020). Preferred learning methods of generation Z.
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., & Rosi, M. (2025). Digitalization of higher education: Students’ perspectives. Education Sciences, 15(7), 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070847
Purmono, B. (2023): Entrepreneurial intention among Generation Z: Education, self-efficacy, and attitude. – Enrichment: Journal of Management 13(1): 16-31. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v13i1.1228
Saxena, M., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). Gamification and gen Z in higher education: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(4), 1-22. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6457-8376
Schlesinger, S. L., Heuwieser, W., & Schüller, L. K. (2021). Comparison of self-directed and instructor-led practice sessions for teaching clinical skills in food animal reproductive medicine. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 48(3), 310-318.
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
Wajdi, M., Susanto, B., Sumartana, I. M., Sutiarso, M. A., & Hadi, W. (2024). Profile of generation Z characteristics: Implications for contemporary educational approaches. Kajian Pendidikan, Seni, Budaya, Sosial dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.58881/kpsbsl.v1i1.8
Wardi, R. H., Hassan, M. H., Yusof, U. Z. M., & Rosman, R. (2025). Gen Z’s Learning Preferences in Creative Design: A Conceptual Framework. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.771
Winarjo, W. (2025). Generational Shift in Learning Discomfort: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Tensions Between Millennials and Generation Z. Journal of Strategy and Transformation in Educational Management, 16-29.
Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023). Teachers’ Role in Digitalizing education: An umbrella review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0
Wu, Y. (2024). Study on the impact of utilizing ChatGPT and other AI tools for feedback in EAP writing classrooms on the discursive writing performance of English major students. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 4, 143-150. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/55dc/6b87a45d8a80c4a267582c422230512ab02f.pdf
Xu, D., Feng, S., & Huang, Z. (2025). Positive and negative factors of the influence of new media and the digital environment on ideal and belief education among university students in China. The Journal of General Psychology, 152(2), 306-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2024.2385105
Xu, X., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, R. (2024). Applying ChatGPT to tackle the side effects of personal learning environments from learner and learning perspective: An interview of experts in higher education. PLoS One, 19(1), e0295646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295646
Yaseen, H., Mohammad, A. S., Ashal, N., Abusaimeh, H., Ali, A., & Sharabati, A. A. A. (2025). The impact of adaptive learning technologies, personalized feedback, and interactive AI tools on student engagement: The moderating role of digital literacy. Sustainability, 17(3), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031133
Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, M., Zakiyah, M., ... & Hardiah, M. (2025). Generative AI as a Cognitive Co-Pilot in English Language Learning in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 15(6), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060686
Zulfachmi,Normala, R., Wan., R., Puji, R. Aggry, S. (2025). Systematic literature review of learning model using augmented reality for generation Z in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Vol. 39 (2),1109-1120.
LOGIN
