Beyond Adoption: Explaining Student Engagement with AI through an Extended TAM–UTAUT Framework

Authors

  • Yip Yen San Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
  • Chan Pui Yee Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
  • Chew Wei Xian Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
  • Foong Yu Xing Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37253/combines.v6i1.12758

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), UTAUT, Student Engagement, Higher Education

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into higher education, yet existing studies mainly focus on students’ intention to use technology rather than their actual engagement with AI learning tools. This study examines the factors influencing student engagement with AI among Generation Z students in Malaysian private higher education institutions. The study extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) by incorporating technological, social, and psychological factors to explain student engagement with AI. A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted using an online survey questionnaire, with data collected from 304 students. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between these factors and student engagement. The findings indicate that perceived usefulness, performance expectancy, social influence, perceived trust, and perceived risk significantly and positively influence student engagement, while perceived ease of use is insignificant. The positive relationship between perceived risk and engagement suggests that students may perceive the benefits of AI as outweighing potential risks. The study contributes to the technology acceptance literature by extending TAM and UTAUT beyond behavioural intention towards engagement outcomes and offers practical insights for higher education institutions implementing AI in learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the association for information systems, 8(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122

Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2025). Research Methods for Business, with eBook Access Code: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Davis, F. D. (1987). User acceptance of information systems: the technology acceptance model (TAM). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30838394_User_acceptance_of_information_systems_the_technology_acceptance_model_TAM

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Maryono, M., Puspitasari, D., & Purwanto, P. (2026). Factors Influencing the Active Engagement of Undergraduate Students in Blended Learning. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 20(1), ID-e282320. https://doi.org/10.55766/sjss282320

Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in development of medical education, 14(3), 1-6.

Oc, Y., Gonsalves, C., & Quamina, L. T. (2025). Generative AI in higher education assessments: Examining risk and tech-savviness on student’s adoption. Journal of Marketing Education, 47(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241302459

Pitts, G., Marcus, V., & Motamedi, S. (2025). Student perspectives on the benefits and risks of AI in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02198. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.02198

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30